Determine the ability of the productive imagination

Imagination is the basis for cultivating creative thinking, and thus the driving force of innovation. Creativity related research has progress for many years, but the understandings of imagination and its symbol still remain unclear. So far, few studies have settled distrib images imagself manifest my own Let alone developed an evaluation tool for assessing imagination. Because of the potential applicability to the profession of educational technology and various fields, some general concepts of imagination must be explained before referring to them specifically with the indicators which might still observed or isolated.

The mind – one of the forms of consciousness, self-conscious mind, aim at himself and conceptual content of his knowledge (Kant, Hegel). Mind expresses itself in the principles, ideas and ideals.

The mind as is mind, affected is itself, is not only different content with each other, but also himself with this content. In View of this, the mind can hold contradictions. Hegel believed that only reaching the mind, finally, a true expression of the truth as a concrete, that is, including the unity of their opposite characteristics. The first dimension is "creative imagination" which Is composed of five indicators: intuition, sensibility, productivity, exploration, and novelty. The second dimension is "reproductive imagination" which contains another five indicators: focusing, effective, transformation, crystallization, and dialectics. In this study, the two dimensions reveal Distinct quality, but still are co-related

Imagination is constantly on the verge of conscious and unconscious, one associative context and the other, destructive and constructive. Therefore, it always creates a wide scope for human self as artist. The process of cognition and creativity, which demands the mobilization of all of Man's intellectual and spiritual strength, is not without imagination-an ability to transform the forth given in concrete-imaginal forms, creating unusual assembly out of ordinary impressions. Imagination depends to a considerable extent on impressions which may be either linked with the present moment or Come from memory, or both. The term imagination has its root in the Latin verb imaginary, meaning "to picture oneself".

19. Give your assessment of the text ‘The phenomenon of alternative science’.

In the science of modern times, and especially in the science of the twentieth century, clear criteria for distinguishing between scientific, pre-scientific, non-scientific and non-scientific knowledge. They were worked out on the basis of philosophical and ideological foundations, ideals and norms of scientific character. These criteria together with the indicated bases ideals and norms did not remain for centuries unchanged, but were subject to change, because the western (a from the end of the XIX century. it is a world science) has passed the stages of the classical, non-classical and post-non-classical. Accordingly, philosophical and ideological bases were transformed. ideals and norms of scientific character, and, together with them, the criteria for of knowledge from other knowledge.

Supporters of pseudoscience not only do not deny, but, on the contrary, emphasize their desire to use the scientific method. They collect facts, put forward guesses and hypotheses substantiate them. But, in spite of this imitation of scientific activity,most scientists, and indeed. It is quite clear to people engaged in pseudoscience that their activity is carried out beyond the bounds of normal science ". In addition, in this work is written about the term deviant science. "The closest to ordinary scientific activity," writes V.P. Filatov, - "deviant science."... Deviant will be such cognitive activity that goes beyond the limits of the accepted at some time or other time in science paradigms (samples) of research and deviates from the methodological and ideological norms and standards, shared by most members of the scientific communities.

In my opinion, the terms "pseudoscience" and "deviant science" are somehow unsuccessful. The term "pseudoscience" is formed from the conjunction of the Greek ψευδής, which means "false, deceptive," and the term "deviant" comes from the Latin "deviatio", which means "deviation". In psychology and jurisprudence, they say about the deviant that is, deviating from the norm behavior. Became

be, both these terms carry negative evaluative connotations. It is better, in our opinion, to use the concept of "alternative science" that is neutral in terms of evaluation, the more that V.P. Filatov himself writes that "the line between science and extra-scientific knowledge is not impassable, and sometimes in pseudoscience" pseudo- "begins to gradually give way "Science", and even disappears completely. As a result, the concept of deviant science, and then recognized scientific theories ". True, in his other work he uses the concept of "Alternative science".

An alternative to the autochthonous view is that the earthly humanity has a cosmic origin walking. This point of view has two main options: but the first, terrestrial humanity - an alien from another star system (example - esoteric mythology Dogon); according to second, terrestrial humanity - a product of selection, carried out-alien creatures.

Conflict of official and alternative science occurs especially in the field of Egyptology. It's about the pyramids on the Giza plateau near modern Cairo, the time of their erection, their purpose, the technologies used in their construction, and thoseknowledge, which are objectified in them. The main structures of Giza are the three pyramids - Khufu (Greek Cheops), Khafra (Greek Khafre) and Menkaure (Greek. Mikerin), as well as the Sphinx. According to official Egyptology, all this was erected during the IV dynasty, i.e. about 4,5 thousand years ago.