2015-08-12
407
Should
Should
§ 107. Should has the following meanings:
Obligation, which in different contexts may acquire addi- tional shades of meaning, such as advisability and desirability,
e.g. It's late. You should go to bed.
You shouldn't miss the opportunity. Should I talk to him about it?
Should in this meaning is found in all kinds of sentences. generally refers an action to the future and is followed by the simple infinitive.
With reference to the present should is used with the Continu- ous infinitive or with the simple infinitive if the verb is stative.
e-g- You shouldn't be sitting in the sun. Move out of it into the
hade. You shouldn't feel so unhappy over such trifles.
Should may be combined with the Perfect infinitive.
. I n an affirmative sentence should + Perfect infinitive indicates that a desirable action was not carried out.
e.g. He looks very ill. He should have stayed at home. He should have told me about it himself.
In a negative sentence should + Perfect infinitive serves to show that an undesirable action was carried out.
e.g. Oh, Renny, you shouldn't have done as you did! They shouldn't have concealed it from us.
2) supposition implying strong probability, e.g. The film should be very good as it is starring first-class actors.
The use of should in this case does not seem to be very com- mon as this meaning is usually rendered by must.
§ 109. emotional should. The use of the emotional should is structurally dependent. It is found in the following cases:
1) In special emphatic constructions, where a simple predicate is not used:
a) in rhetorical questions beginning with why, e.g. Why should I do it? (С какой стати я буду делать это?)
Why shouldn't you invite him? (Почему бы вам его не при-
|
|
|
гласить?)
b) in object clauses beginning with why, e.g. I don't know why he should want to see George. (Я незнаю, зачем ему нужен Джордж.) I don't see why we shouldn't make friends,
c) in attributive clauses beginning with why after the noun reason, e.g. There is no reason why they shouldn't get on very well to- gether. (Нет причины, почему бы им не ладить друг с другом.) I don't see any reason why he shouldn't be happy,
d) in constructions of the following kind,
e.g. The door opened and who should come in but Tom. (Дверь открылась, и кто бы вы думаливошел? Не кто иной, как Том.)
As I was crossing the street, whom should I meet but Aunt Ann.
e) in the set phrase How should I know? (Почем я знаю?). In the above cases should may be followed by the Perfect in- finitive which in simple sentences refers the action to the past (a) and in complex sentences shows that the action of the subordinate clause precedes that of the principal clause (b).
E-g. a) I went into business with her as her partner. Why shouldn't I have done it? (Почему бы мнебыло не сделать этого?) b) He did not know why he should have expected them to look different. (Он не знал, почему он ожидал увидеть их другими.)
