1. Bix B. Jurisprudence. Theory and Context. – 2nd ed. – L.: Sweet & Maxwell, 1999.
2. Bix B. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. – N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1993.
3. Berman H.J., Greiner W.R., Saliba S.N. The Nature and Functions of Law. – 5th ed. – Westbury, NY.: Foundation Press, 1996.
4. Coleman J.L. Markets, Morals, and the Law. – N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
5. Cotterrell R.M. Law's Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
6. Goodrich P. Languages of Law: From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks. – L.: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1990.
7. Gray P.N. Artificial Legal Intelligence. – Brookfield, Vt., USA: Dartmouth, 1997.
8. Hunt A. The Sociological Movement in Law. – Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1978.
9. Informaticsand the Foundations of Legal Reasoning / Ed. by Z. Bankowski, I. White, U. Hahn. – Boston: Kluwer, 1995.
10. Jackson B.S. Making Sense in Law: Linguistic, Psychological and Semiotic Perspectives. – Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications, 1995.
11. Kramer M.H. Legal Theory, Political Theory, and Deconstruction: Against Rhadamanthus. – Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.
12. Legal Hermeneutics:History, Theory, and Practice / Ed. by G. Leyh. – Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
13. Moore S.F. Law as Process: an Anthropological Approach. – Boston: Routledge & K. Paul, 1978. 1998.
14. Posner R.A. Economic Analysis of Law. – 5th ed. – N.Y.: Aspen Law & Business, 1998.
15. Prakken H. Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. – Boston: Kluwer, 1997.
16. Teubner G. Law as an Autopoietic System. – Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publis.
В. И. Кузнэцов
|
|
ТИПЫ СЛОЖНОСТИ ПРАВА
Можно выделить три типа сложности права: объективную, проблемную и эпиетимологическую, каждая из которых в свою очередь подразделяется на определенные подтипы, которые в совокупности определяют поиски эффективных методов исследования права и его моделей.
V. I. Kuznetsov
THE TYPES OF COMPLEXITIES OF LAW
It is possible to distinguish three types of complexities of law, such as objective, problematic, and etymological. Each of the three, in turn, is subdivided into certain subtypes, which in sum determine ways efficient methods in study of law and its models are sought.
© 2003р. Є. В. Бурлай
Інститут міжнародних відносин
Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка
ДУАЛІЗМ “ПРИРОДНОГО” ТА “ПОЗИТИВНОГО”