Монографии, учебники, статьи

 

176. Азаров О. Вступ України до СОТ як приоритетний напрямок її зовнішньоекономічної політики // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – C. 189-195.

177. Азаров О. Правове регулювання міжнародної торгівлі в системі ГАТТ/СОТ (інституційні аспекти): Дис... канд. юрид. наук:12.00.11. – К., 2002. – 161 с.

178. Анисимов Л.Н. Международно-правовые средства разрешения межгосударственных споров /конфликтов/. – Ленинград: Изд-во Ленинградского университета, 1975. – 164 с.

179. Асланян Г. Ступінь відповідності законодавства України вимогам Світової організації торгівлі // Парламент. Часопис. –2003. – №7. – С. 31-38.

180. Безрученко В. Проблеми державного регулювання зовнішньоекономічної діяльності // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 89-94.

181. Богуславский М.М. Международное экономическое право. – М.: Международные отношения, 1986. – 304 с.

182. Борисова Е.А. Апелляция в гражданском (арбитражном) процессе. – 2-е изд., испр., доп. – М.: Городец, 2000. – 288 с.

183.   Варналій З. Приєднання України до Світової організації торгівлі у контексті забезпечення економічної безпеки // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 95-100.

184. Василенко В.А. Международно-правовые санкции. – К.: Вища школа, 1982. – 230 с.

185. Василенко В.А. Ответственность государства за международные правонарушения. – К.: Вища школа, 1976. – 260 с.

186.   Вахания Т.В. Возможные жалобы России и наоборот – стран-членов при эвентуальном вступлении России в ВТО // Международное публичное и частное право.  –  2005. – №4 (25). – С. 29-32.

187.   Вельяминов Г.М. Порядок урегулирования споров во Всемирной торговой организации // Московский журнал международного права. – 1999. – № 1. – С. 96-109.

188.   Вельяминов Г.М. Правовое регулирование международной торговли. Опыт ЮНКТАД. – М.: Международные отношения, 1972. – 254 с.

189.  Венская конвенция о праве международных договоров. Комментарий. – М.: Юридическая лит-ра, 1997. – 336 с.

190.   Голубєва В.О. Вступ України до СОТ: умови та наслідки // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2004. – №1(13). – С. 15-19.

191.   Григорян С.А. Международно-правовая система Всемирной торговой организации и интересы России: Дисс... докт. юрид. наук: 12.00.10. – М., 2000. – 361 с.

192.   Дюмулен И.И. Всемирная торговая организация. – М.: ЗАО Издательство «Экономика», 2003. – 271 с.

193.   Зенкин И.В. Право Всемирной торговой организации: Учебное пособие. – М.: Международные отношения, 2003. – 248 с.

194.   Иринчина И.Б. Регулювання зовнішньоторговельних відносин України у процесі приєднання до СОТ: Дис... канд. екон. наук: 08.05.01. – К., 2003. – 190 с.

195.  Інституціональні та процедурні механізми системи ГАТТ/СОТ у регулюванні світової торгівлі / Осика С., Оніщук О., Осика А., Пятницький В., Штефанюк О. – К.: УАЗТ, 2000. – 228 с.

196.   Карро Д., Жюйар П. Международное экономическое право: Пер. с франц. Серебренникова В.П., Шумилова В.М. – М.: Международные отношения, 2001. – 608 с.

197.   Касьян Н.Ф. Консенсус в современных международных отношениях: Международно-правовые вопросы. – М.: Международные отношения, 1983. – 120 с.

198. Куряев А. Кризис системы ГАТТ/ВТО // Горизонты промышленной политики. – 2004. – март. – http://www.prompolit.ru/146870.htm

199.   Кучер. Б.И. Международный экономический правопорядок. – К.: Юридическая лит-ра, 1975. – 260 с.

200.   Лукашук И.И. Международное право: Учебник. Особенная часть. – М.: Издательство БЕК, 1998. – 410 с.

201.   Лукашук И.И. Право международной ответственности // Международное публичное и частное право. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 30-43.

202. Мальский О. Чем Украина не Китай? // Зеркало недели. – 2006. – №31(610).

203. Манько В. В ожидании ВТО. Сможет ли Украина воспользоваться преимуществами от вступления в клуб мировой торговли // Зеркало недели. – 2005. – №48(576).

204. Мартьянов О. Лук’янов А. Проблеми економічної безпеки України в контексті вступу України до СОТ // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 185-188.

205. Международное право / Под ред. Ю.М. Колосова, Э.С. Кривчиковой. – М.: Международные отношения, 2000. – 720 с.

206. Международное право: Учебник / Талалаев А.Н., Тункин Г.И., Шестаков Л.Н. и др. – М.: Юридическая литература, 1999. – 560 с.

207. Международное право: Учебник для ВУЗов / Отв. ред. Г.В. Игнатенко, О.И. Тиунов – М.: Издательская группа Норма-Инфра, 1999. – 584 с.

208. Международное право: Учебник. – 4-е изд., доп. и перераб. / Под ред. Ф.И. Кожевникова. – М.: Международные отношения, 1981. – 456 с.

209. Международное право: Учебник. –2-е изд., доп. и перераб. / Отв. ред. Ю.М. Колосов, В.И. Кузнецов – М.: Международные отношения, 1998. – 624 с.

210. Мережко О.О. Lex Mercatoria: теория и принципы транснационального торгового права. – К.: Таксон, 1999. – 416 с.

211. Мережко О.О. Механізм розв’язання суперечок у рамках системи ГАТТ/СОТ // Український правовий часопис. – 2003. – №3 (8). – С.73-80.

212. Мілорава М.Ш. Розвиток міжнародно-правового механізму з врегулювання спорів СОТ, його місце та значення у системі міжнародної економічної безпеки // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2003. – № 3(7). Частина 1. – С. 49-58.

213. Мінін Л. Надбання та втрати від участі у СОТ з позиції вітчизняних виробників // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 73-76.

214. Моравецкий В. Функции международных организаций: Пер. с пол. Г.Б. Борина, Н.Г. Прудковой. – М.: Прогресс, 1976. – 399 с.

215.   Нешатаева Т.Н. Международные организации и право. Новые тенденции в международно-правовом регулировании. – 2-е. изд. – М.: Дело, 1999. – 272 с.

216. Нормативні та інформаційні матеріали до парламентських слухань: «Стан підготовки вступу України до Світової організації торгівлі (СОТ), проблеми та перспективи» 18 жовтня 2006 р. – К.: Верховна Рада України, 2006. – 30 с.

217. Оніщук О. Міжнародна торговельна політика у сфері субсидування і пропозиції щодо регулювання державної допомоги в Україні // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2003. – №7(11). – С. 103-118.

218. Оппенгейм Л. Международное право: в 2-х т., Т.1: Пер. с англ. Г. Лаутерпахт. – М.: Иностранная лит-ра, 1949. – 584 с.

219. Організація процесу приєднання України до СОТ: плюси і мінуси. Аналітичний звіт Центру економічних політичних досліджень ім. О. Разумкова // Національна безпека и оборона. – 2002. – № 6(30). – С. 17-40.

220. Осика С. Пятницький В. Світова організація торгівлі. – К.: К.І.С., 2001. – 491 с.

221. Панфілова Т. Потенційно загрозливі фактори набуття Україною членства у Світовій організації торгівлі // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 177-180.

222. Пахомов Ю. Вступление Украины в ВТО как предпосылка и фактор устойчивого экономического роста // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 37-46.

223. Приказчиков А. Механизм разрешения споров во Всемирной торговой организации // Право и политика. Международный научный журнал. – 2000. – №6. – http://www.law-and-politics.com/paper.shtml?a=6_2000&o=241317

224. Пушмин Э.А. Посредничество в международном праве. – М.: Международные отношения, 1970. – 167 с.

225. Пятницький В. Деякі аспекти формування стратегії вступу України до СОТ // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 165-170.

226. Роговий В. Стратегія і тактика приєднання України до СОТ // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 9-15.

227. Рубинштейн Т.Б. ВТО: практический аспект. – М.: Гелиос АРВ, 2004. – 528 с.

228. Сиденко В., Барановский А. Украина и Всемирная торговая организация: как увеличить плюсы и уменьшить минусы? // Зеркало недели. – 2002. –№26(410).

229. Сухоруков А. Забезпечення економічної безпеки України в процесі приєднання до СОТ // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 153-159.

230. Тимченко Л.Д. Международное право: Учебник. – Х.: «Консум», 1999. – 528 с.

231. Тихонов А. ВТОрая ООН // Финансовые известия. –2003. – 5 авг. – http://www.finiz.ru/cfin/tmpl-art/id_art-611678/

232. Трунк-Федорова М.П. Разрешение споров в рамках Всемирной торговой организации. – СПб.: Издательство юридического факультета С-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 1995. – 312 с.

233. Тускоз Ж. Міжнародне право: Підручник: Пер. з франц. Л. Бадешко. – К.: АртЕк, 1998. – 416 с.

234. Хадсон М. О. Международные суды в прошлом и будущем: Пер. с англ. – М.: Госиностраниздат, 1947. – 391 с.

235. Циганкова Т. Багатоаспектність наслідків приєднання України до СОТ // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 161-164.

236. Шепенко Р.А. Третейские группы ВТО // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. – 2002. – №1. – С. 34-39.

237. Шибаева Е.А. Правовой статус межправительственных организаций. – М.: Юридическая лит-ра, 1972. – 192 с.

238. Энтин М.Л. Международные судебные учреждения. Роль международных арбитражных и судебных органов в разрешении межгосударственных споров. – М.: Международные отношения, 1984. – 174 с.

 

***

239.   Anderson K. Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement // Discussion Paper № 0207. – Adelaide University: Centre for International Economic Studies, March 2002. – http://www.adelaide.edu.au/cies/

240.   Aslan Ahmad I. Developing Countries and the WTO Dispute Settlement System. – Switzerland, Bern: World Trade Institute, 2001.

241.   Bacchus J. Groping Toward Grotius: The WTO and the International Rule of Law // Harvard International Law Journal. – 2003. – Vol. 44(2). – P. 533-550.

242.   Bacchus J. Open Doors for Open Trade: Shining Light on WTO Dispute Settlement // Remarks to the National Foreign Trade Council. – Washington DC, 2004.

243.   Bacchus J. Table Talk: Around the Table of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organisation // Vanderbilt Journal of Transitional Law. – 2002. – Vol. 35, № 4. – P. 1021-1039.

244.   Bacchus J. The Appeals of Trade: the Making of an Old GATT Hand // Address to the International Law Conference of the American BAR Association. – Washington DC: Georgetown Law School, 2003.

245.   Bacchus J. The Strange Death of Sir Francis Bacon: The Dos and Don’ts of Appellate Advocacy in the WTO // Address at the Barber-Surgeons Hall. – London, 2003.

246.   Bacchus J. “Woulda, Coulda Shoulda”: The Consolations of WTO Dispute Settlement // Address to the International BAR Association. – Geneva, 2003.

247. Bagwell K., Mavroidis P., Staiger R. The Case for Tradable Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement // WB Policy Research Working Paper № 3314. – World Bank, May 2004.

248.   Bagwell K., Staiger R. GATT – Think // NBER Working Paper Series. – Working Paper № 8005. – MA. Cambridge, 2000.

249.   Barfield C. Free Trade, Sovereignty and Democracy. Proposals for Reform and Reasons for Retaining the Status Quo. – Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute Press, 2001.

250.   Bello J.H. The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More //American Journal of International Law. – 1996. –Vol. 90. – P. 416-418.

251.   Bhagwati J. The World Trading System at Risk. – Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1991.

252.   Bhala R. The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law // American University International Law Review. – 1999. –Vol. 14. – P. 845-956.

253.  Black’s Law Dictionary: 6^th-ed. – St.Paul, 1990.

254.  Black’s Law Dictionary: 7^th-ed. – St.Paul, 1999.

255.   Bown C.P. On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement // The Review of Economics and Statistics – 2003. – Vol.86 (3). – P. 811-823.

256.   Bown C.P. The Economics of Trade Disputes, the GATT’s Article XXIII and the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding. – Waltham: Brandeis University, 2001.

257.  Bown C.P. Trade Disputes and the Implementation of Protection under GATT: An Empirical Assessment. –Waltham: Brandeis University, 2001.

258.  Bown C.P. Trade Remedies and WTO Disputes Settlement: Why Are So Few Challenged? – Waltham: The Brookings Institution & Brandeis University, 2004.

259.   Brandsteller P. The Participation of NGO’s in the WTO Dispute Settlement System. – NY: New York University, 2003.

260.   Breuss F. WTO Dispute Settlement from an Economic Perspective. More Failure than Success //Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration: Research Institute for European Affairs. – Working Paper № 39. – Vienna, 2001.

261.   Brimeyer B.L. Bananas, Beef and Compliance in the World Trade Organisation: the Inability of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process to Achieve Compliance From Superpower Nations // Minnesota Journal of Global Trade. – 2001. – Winter. – P.133-168.

262.   Bronckers M., Van den Broek N. Financial Compensation in the WTO: Improving the Remedies of WTO Dispute Settlement // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2005. – Vol. 8(1). – P. 101-126.

263.   Bronckers M., Jackson J. Editorial Comment: Outside Counsel in WTO Dispute Process // Journal of International Economic Law. – 1999. – Vol. 2(1). – 155-158.

264.   Bronckers M. More Power to the WTO? // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2001. – Vol. 4. – P. 41-65.

265.   Brosch K. Improvements in WTO Dispute Settlement // Agriculture in the WTO: Economic Research Service / USDA. – 1998. – WRS-98-4. – P. 36-40.

266.   Buergenthal T., Maier H. Public International Law in Nutshell: 2^nd ed. – St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co, 1990.

267. Busch M.L. Democracy, Consultation, and the Panelling of Disputes under GATT. – Cambridge: Harvard University, 1999.

268. Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Developing Countries and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade / World Trade Organisation Dispute Settlement // Journal of World Trade. – 2003. – Vol. 37(4). – P. 719-735.

269.   Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. The Evolution of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement // Trade Policy Review. – 2003. – P. 143-183.

270.  Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement. – Atlanta: Emory University, 2000.

271.   Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Three’s a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement. – Atlanta: Emory University, 2000.

272.   Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Trade Brief on the WTO Dispute Settlement. – Stockholm: SIDA, 2004.

273.   Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Transatlantic Trade Conflicts and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement // Transatlantic Ecomonic Disputes: the EU, the US and the WTO by Petersmann E.U. and Pollack M.A. (eds.) – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.  – P. 465- 485.

274.   Bütler M., Hauser H. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: a First Assessment from an Economic Perspective // Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. – 2000. – Vol.16, № 2. – P. 792-821.

275.   Cameron J., Gray K.R. Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. – 2001. –Vol. 50(2). – P. 248-298.

276.   Canal-Forges E. Le Système de Réglement des Diférénds le l’OMC // Revue Générale de Droit International Public. – 1994. – P. 689-718.

277.   Chakravarthi R. The World Trade Organisation and its Dispute Settlement System: Titling the Balance against the South // Trade and Development Series. – 2000. – №9. – P. 1-48.

278.   Chang Pao-Li. The Evolution and Utilisation of the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism // Materials of Research Seminar in International Economics. – Discussion Paper № 475. – Michigan University, April 2002.

279.   Charnovitz S. Judicial Independence in the World Trade Organisation // International Organisations and International Dispute Settlement: Trends and Prospects by de Chazournes L.B., Romano C. and MacKenzie R. (eds.) – P. 219-240.

280.   Charnovitz S. Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions //American Journal of International Law. – 2002. –Vol. 95. – P. 792-832.

281.   Charnovitz S. The WTO’s Problematic “Last Resort” Against Non-compliance // Aussenwirtschaft. – 2002. – № 57(4) – P. 409-439.

282.   Chaytor B. Reforming Dispute Settlement for Sustainable Development // Materials of the Workshop Organised by Institute for International and European Environmental Policy. – Berlin. – 2002.

283.   Clarkson S. Locked In? Canada’s External Constitution under global Trade Governance // preprint for American Review of Canadian Studies. – 2002. – Nov. – http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-3387324/Locked-in-Canada-s-external.html

284.   Cottier T., Satoko T. The Balance of Power in WTO Decision-Making – Towards Weighted Voting in Legislative Response // Aussenwirtschaft. –2003. – Vol.59(2). – P. 171-214.

285.   Croley S.P., Jackson J.H. WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments // American Journal of International Law. – 1996. – Vol. 90, Issue 2., Apr. – P. 193-213.

286.   Dam K. The GATT: Law and International Economic Organisation. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

287.   Davey W.J., Adams E. M. Japan, WTO Dispute Settlement and the Millennium Round. – Illinois: University of Illinois, 2000.

288.   Davey W.J. Implementation in the WTO Dispute Settlemen: An Introduction to the Problems and Possible Solutions // Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series. – Research Paper №05-16. – Illinois: November, 2005.

289.   Davey W.J. Reforming the WTO Dispute Settlement // Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series. – Research Paper № 04-01 – Illinois: 2000.

290.   Davey W.J. Resolving US-European Trade Disputes Through Law: Is the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism Effective? – Illinois: University of Illinois, 2003.

291.   Davey W.J. The WTO/GATT World Trading System: An Overview // Handbook of WTO/GATT Dispute Settlement by Pescatore P. et al. (eds.). – Irvington on Hudson, N.Y.: Transnational Juris Publications; The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1991.

292.   De Bievre D. Judicialisation and Positive Integration in the WTO // Materials of the 5th Pan-European International Relations Conference. – Standing Group on International Relations (SGIR) of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR). – Netherlands, Den Haag. – September 2004.

293.   Dempsey K.M. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Practising Lawyer’s Perspective // Remarks before Symposium on Legal Issues in the Doha Agenda. – China, Shanghai, 2003.

294.   Diego-Fernandez M., Herran R. The Reform of the WTO Dispute Understanding: A Closer Look at the Mexican Proposal // Manchester Journal of International Economic Law. – 2004. – Vol. 1(1). – P. 4-23.

295. Ehlermann C.-D. Tension Between the Dispute Settlement Process and the Diplomatic and Treaty-Making Activities of the WTO // World Trade Review. – 2002. – № 1(3). –P. 301-308.

296.   Ehlermann C.-D. Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court” – Some Personal Experience as Member of the Appellate Body of the WTO// Journal of the World Trade. –2002. –36(4). – P. 605-639.

297.  Enhancing the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding: A Working Group Report. – London: The Federal Trust for Education and Research, December 2002.

298.   Feliciano F.P., Van den Bossche P. The Dispute Settlement Process of the World Trade Organisation – Institutions, Process and Practice // Proliferation of International Organisations – Legal Issues by Blokker N. and Schermers, H. (eds.) – The Hague: Kluwer. – P. 297-350.

299.   Freneau A. WTO Dispute Settlement System and Implementation of Decisions: a Developing Country Perspective. – Manchester: University of Manchester, 2000.

300.   Garrett G., McCallSmith J. The Politics of WTO Dispute Settlement // Materials of the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. – Atlanta: Yale University, 1999.

301.   Gascoine D. WTO Dispute Settlement: Lessons Learned from Salmon Case // Materials of the 5th Annual Conference on International Trade Education and Research of the Australia. – Melbourne: APEC Study Centre, 2000.

302.  GATS – Fact and Fiction. – Geneva: WTO, 2001.

303.   Gleason C., Walther P. The WTO Dispute Settlement Implementation Procedures: A System on Need of Reform // Law and Policy in International Business. – 2000. – Spring. – P. 709-736.

304.   Goh G., Witbreuk T. An Introduction to the WTO Dispute Settlement System // University of Western Australia Law Review. – 2001. – Vol. 30(1). – P. 51-74.

305.   Grane P. Remedies under WTO Law // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2001. – Vol. 4. – P. 755-772.

306.   Gray Ch. Types of Remedies in ICJ Cases: Lessons for the WTO? // Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures by Weiss, F. (ed.) – London: Cameron May, 2000. – P. 401-415.

307.   Griller S. Judicial Enforceability of the WTO Law in the European Union. Annotation to case C-149/96 Portugal vs. Council // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2000. – Vol. 3. – P. 441-472.

308.   Guzman A. The Political Economy of Litigation and Settlement at the WTO. – Berkeley: UC Berkeley, 2003.

309.   Hecht J. C. Operation of WTO Settlement Panels: Assessing Proposals for Reform // Materials of the American BAR Association Conference “The First Five Years of the WTO” at the Georgetown University Law Center. – January 2000.

310.   Helmedach Ahim, Zangl B. Dispute Settlement under GATT and WTO: An Empirical Enquiry into a Regime Change // Materials of the Pan-European International Relations Conference “Constructing World Orders”. – Hague. – September 2004.

311.   Hird J. WTO Dispute Settlement Managing the Agenda after Seattle // Materials of the 5th Annual Conference on International Trade Education and Research of the Australia. – Melbourne: APEC Study Centre, 2000.

312.   Hoekman B.M., Mavroidis P.C. Competition, Competition Policy and the GATT // World Economy. – 1994. – Vol. 17. – P.121-150.

313.   Hoekman B.M., Mavroidis P.C. Enforcing Multilateral Commitments: Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries //Materials of the WTO - World Bank Conference on Developing Countries in a Millennium Round. – Geneva: WTO Secretariat, 1999.

314.   Hoekman B.M. and Mavroidis P.C. WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance. – Washington DC: World Bank, Nov. 1999.

315.   Holmes P., Rollo J., Young A. Emerging Trends in WTO Dispute Settlement. Back to the GATT? // World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series. – Working Paper № 3133. – 2003.

316.   Horlick G. Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process // The Political Economy of International Trade Law by Kennedy D. and Southwick J. (eds.). – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. – P. 636–645.

317.   Horn H., Mavroidis P., Nordstrom H. Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?// Discussion Paper № 2340. – London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 1999.

318.   Horn H., Mavroidis P.C. Remedies in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Developing Country Interest. – Washington DC: World Bank, 1999.

319.   Hudec R.E. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. – Salem NH: Butterworth Legal Publishers, 1993.

320.   Hudec R.E. Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement // preprint for Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Process by Weiss F. and Wiers J. (eds.) – London: Cameron May Publishers, 2000.

321.   Hudec R.E. Does Agreement on Agriculture Work? Agricultural Disputes after the Uruguay Round // IATRC Working Paper № 98-2. – International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, University of Minnesota, 1998.

322.   Hudec R.E. GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an “Aim and Effect” Test. – Minn.: University of Minnesota, 1998.

323.   Hudec R.E. Retaliation against Unreasonable Foreign Trade Practices: The New Section 301 and GATT Nullification and Impairment // Minnesota Law Review. – 1975. – Vol. 59. – P. 461-513.

324.  ICC: Proposals for Improvements to the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Paris: ICC, March 2003, Doc. 103/235.

325.  Institutional Reform of the WTO // Oxfam GB Discussion Paper. – London: Oxfam, 2000.

326.  International Law Association: International Trade Law Committee. – 6^th Report // Materials of  Berlin ILA Conference. – Berlin. – 2004.

327.   Irwin D.A. The GATT’s Contribution to Economic Recovery in Post-War Western Europe // NBER Working Paper Series. – Working Paper №4944. – MA. Cambridge, 1994.

328.  Issues Regarding the Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism // Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity (T.R.A.D.E.). Working Papers’ Series. – №1. – South Centre, 1999.

329.   Jackson J.H. The Legal Meaning of the GATT Dispute Settlement Report // The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO: Insights on treaty law and economic relations. – Cambridge, 2000. – P. 162-167.

330.   Jackson J.H. Dispute Settlement in the WTO: Policy and Jurisprudential Considerations. – Michigan: The University of Michigan, 1998.

331.   Jackson J.H. The World Trading System – 2^nd ed. – Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1997.

332.   Jackson J.H. The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstanding on the Nature of Legal Obligation // American Journal of International Law. – 1997. –Vol. 91, Issue 1. – P. 60-64.

333.   Janov M.E. The Role of the Secretariat in Dispute Settlement // preprint for the World Trade Forum. – University if Michigan Press, 2003. – Vol. 4.

334. Jenkins R. Accountability and the WTO Dispute-Settlement System // preprint for Governance and Democratic Legitimacy: Transnational, European and Multilevel Issues by Benz A. and Papandopoulos Y. (eds.) – London: Routledge, 2004.

335.   Jung Youngjin. Modelling a WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism in an International Antitrust Agreement. An Impossible Dream? // Journal of World Trade. – 2000. – Vol. 34(1). – P. 89-110.

336.   Kearns J. E., Charnovitz S. Adjudicating Compliance in the WTO:
Review of DSU Article 21.5 // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2002. – Vol. 5. –P. 331-352.

337.   Komuro N., Vermulst E. Antidumping Disputes in the WTO: Navigating Dire Straits // Journal of World Trade – 1997. – Vol. 31. – P. 5-44.

338.   Kufuor K.O. From the GATT to the WTO - The Developing Countries and the Reform of the Procedures for the Settlement of International Trade Disputes // Journal of World Trade – 1997. – Vol. 31(5). – P.117-147.

339.   Lacarte-Muro J., Gappah P. Developing Countries and the WTO. Legal and Dispute Settlement System: a View from the Bench // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2000. – Vol. 3(3). – P. 395-401.

340.   Lanye Zhu. The Effects of the WTO Dispute Settlement Panel and Appellate Body Reports: Is the Dispute Settlement Body Resolving Specific Disputes Only or Making Precedent at the Same Time? // Temple International & Comparative Law Journal. –2003. – Vol. 17:1. – P. 221-236.

341.   Lida Keisuke. Is WTO Dispute Settlement Effective? // Global Governance. – 2004. – Vol.10. – P. 207-225.

342.   Lindsey B., Griswold D., Groombridge M., Lukas, A. Seattle and Beyond. A WTO Agenda for the New Millennium // Trade Policy Analysis. – Washington DC: Centre for Trade Policy Studies. – 1999. – № 8. – P. 2-45.

343.   MacKenzie D. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: War Is Easier, Cheaper, and Faster // Materials of the Annual Symposium: WTO – Yes or No? – Ottawa. – Nov. 2001.

344.  Mansfield E., Reinhardt E. Multilateral Determinations of Regionalism: the Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Preferential Trading Agreements //Address at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. – Washington DC, 2000.

345.   Marceau G. Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Jurisdictions: The Relationships between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other Treaties // Journal of World Trade. – 2001. – Vol. 35(6). – P. 1081-1131.

346.   Marceau G. WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights // European Journal of International Law. – 2002. – Vol. 13(4). – P. 753-814.

347.   Matibini P., Onyemaechi E. TRIPS Dispute Settlement Mechanism under WTO: Is it Negotiations or Adjudication? – Turin: The University of Turin, 2000.

348.   Mavroidis P.C. Amicus Curiae Briefs Before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing // European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus Dieter Ehlermann by Von Bogdandy A., Mavroidis P.C. and Menu Y. (eds). – Kluwer, 2002.

349.   Mavroidis P.C. Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place // preprint for European Journal of International Law. – 2000. – Vol. 11(4) // www.ejil.org/journal/Vol11/No4/art1.pdf

350.   Merrills J.G. International Dispute Settlement. – Cambridge, 2000.

351.   Mosoti V. Does Africa Needs the WTO Dispute Settlement System? – Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2003.

352.   Narsinghen H. Dispute Settlement Process under GATT/WTO: Diplomatic or Judicial Process? // Social Sciences and Humanities and Law & Management Research Journal. – 1999. – Vol. 2. – P. 97-110.

353.   Nülle G.M. The WTO's Mercantilist Flaw // Ludwig Von Mises Institute Online Publications. – 27 September 2004. – http://www.mises.org/articles.aspx

354.  Open Letter on Institutional Reforms in the WTO / WWF Int’l, IATP, ActionAid, FOE Int’l, CIEL, Oxfam Int’l. – Joint NGO Open Letter № 60. – October 2000.

355.   Oxley A. The Challenge of Free Trade. – NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1990.

356. Palmeter D., Mavroidis P.C. Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization - Practice and Procedure. – Hague, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1999.

357.   Palmeter D. The WTO As a Legal System // Fordham International Law Journal. – Vol. 24 (1 & 2) – 2000. – P. 444-480.

358.   Park Y. D., Umbricht G. C. WTO Dispute Settlement 1995-2000: A Statistical Analysis // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2001. – Vol. 4(1). – P. 213-230.

359.   Parlin C.C. WTO Dispute Settlement: Are Sufficient Resources Being Devoted to Enable the System to Function Effectively // The International Lawyer – 1998. – Fall. – Р. 863-870.

360. Pauwelyn J. Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules. – Toward a More Collective Approach // American Journal of International Law. – 2000. – Vol.94, Issue 2. – P. 335-347.

361.   Pauwelyn J. The Limits of Litigation: “Americanisation” and Negotiation in the Settlement of WTO Disputes // Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution. – 2003. –Vol.19:1. – P. 121-140.

362.   Pauwelyn J. The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go? // American Journal of International Law. – 2001. – Vol.95. – P. 535-578.

363.   Pere M. Non-Implementation of WTO Dispute Settlement and Liability Actions // Nordic Journal of Commercial Law. – 2004. – №1. – P. 1-61.

364.   Petersmann E.-U. International Competition Rules for the GATT/WTO World Trade and Legal System // Journal of World Trade. – 1993. – Vol.27(6). – P. 35-72.

365. Petersmann E.-U. (ed.). International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System. – London: Kluwer, 1999.

366.   Petersmann E.-U. The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System. International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement. – Den Haag: Kluwer Law International, 1997.

367. Quick R. Scope / Need for Strengthening WTO Rules, Especially Regarding Dispute Settlement, Institutional Issues, and Functioning of the System in Globalising World: National Europe Centre Paper № 59 // Materials of the Workshop “Australia and the European Union in the Multilateral Trade Round: Defining the Common Ground”. – Canberra, 2002.

368. Ragosta J. Unmasking the WTO: Access to the DSB System: Can the WTO DSB Live Up  to  the  Moniker “World Trade Court?” – GWU School of Law, 2000 // preprint  for  Law and Policy International Business. – Vol. 31. – 2000. – www.law.georgetown.edu/journals/gjil/symp00/documents/ragosta.pdf

369.   Ragosta J., Navin J., Zeldovich M. WTO Dispute Settlement: the System is Flawed and Must Be Fixed. – GWU School of Law, 2000 // preprint for International Lawyer. – Vol. 37. – 2003. – http://www.dbtrade.com/publications/wto_dispute_settlement_is_flawed.pdf

370.   Razeen S. Whither the WTO? A Progress Report on the Doha Round. – London: Centre for Trade Policy Studies // Trade Policy Analysis – 2003. – Vol.23 – P. 1-36.

371.  Recommendations for Ways Forward on Institutional Reform of the World Trade Organisation / Action Aid, CAFOD, Christian Aid, Consumers International, FIELD, Oxfam, RSPB, WDM. – Discussion Paper. – London, 1999.

372.   Reif T.M., Florestal M. Revenge of the Push- Me, Pull-You: The Implementation Process under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding // The International Lawyer. – 1998. – Fall. – P.755-799.

373.   Reinhardt E. Aggressive Multilateralism: The Determinants of GATT/WTO Dispute Initiation, 1948-1998. – Atlanta: Emory University, 2000.

374.  Review of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) // Discussion Paper from the European Communities. – Brussels, October 21, 1998.

375.   Rockwell Ll.H. WTO Forments a Trade War // Ludwig Von Mises Institute Online Publications. – 22 January 2002. – http://www.mises.org/articles.aspx

376.   Roessler F. Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries under the WTO Dispute Settlement System. – Geneva: WTO, Advisory Centre of WTO Law, 2003.

377.   Rosendorff P. Stability and Rigidity: Politics and Design of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Procedure. – LA: University of Southern California, 2005.

378. Sebenius J.K. Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties // International Organization. – 1983. –Vol. 37 (2). – P. 281-316.

379.  Sectoral Consultations on Dispute Settlement // Discussion Paper. – Canada: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1999.

380.   Shaffer G. Weaknesses and Proposed Improvements to the WTO Dispute Settlement System: an Economic and Market-Oriented View // Materials of the Conference: WTO at Ten: a Look at the Appellate Body. – San Paulo, Brazil. – May 2005.

381.  Shaping International Economic Law: An Interview with John H. Jackson // The Journal of International Institute (University of Michigan). – 1997. – Vol. 5(1). –http://www.umich.edu/~iinet/journal/vol5no1/jackson4.html

382.   Shirzad F. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: Prospects for Reform // Published Materials of the  “First Five Years of the WTO”, American BAR Association Conference. – Georgetown University Law Center. – January 2000.

383.   Steger D.P. Key Procedural Issues: Resources; Comments // The International Lawyer. – 1998. – Fall. – P. 871-875.

384.   Stewart T.P. Review of the Dispute Settlement Understanding: Operation of Panels // published materials of the “First Five Years of the WTO”, American BAR Association Conference. – Georgetown University Law Center. – January 2000.

385. Stoler A. L. Key Procedural Issues: Resources; Comments // The International Lawyer. – 1998. – Fall. – P. 878-880.

386.   Sutherland, P. et al. The Future of the WTO. Addressing the Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium. Report by the Consultative Board to the Director General. – Geneva: WTO, 2005.

387.   Sykes A.O. The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?// New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson by Bronckers M., Quick R. (eds.) – The Hague: Kluwer International, 2000. – P. 347- 457.

388.  Testimony of Lori Wallach Regarding the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Powerful Enforcement of Unbalanced, Extensive Regulations without Basic Due Process Protections. – Washington DC: Senate Finance Committee, 2000.

389.  Testimony of Susan G. Esserman, General Council Office of the United States Trade Representative. – Washington DC: House International Relations, Economic Policy and Trade Subcommittee, 1998.

390.   Trachtman J.P. Ubi Remedium, Ibi Jus at the WTO // Materials of the Conference on WTO Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries: Use, Implications, Strategies, Reforms. – University of Wisconsin. – May 2005.

391.   Trebilcock M., Howse R. The regulation of international trade. – 2 ed. – London: Routledge, 1999.

392.   Ujjwal Kumar. Dispute Settlement at WTO from Politics to Legality? // Briefing Paper. – CUTS Centre for International Trade, Economics and Environment. –1999. – № 3. –P. 1-6.

393.   Valles C., McGivern B. The Right to Retaliate under the WTO Agreement: The “Sequencing” Problem // Journal of World Trade. – 2000. – Vol. 34(2). – P. 63-84.

394.   Van den Bossche P. The Doha Development Round Negatiations on the Dispute Settlement Understanding // Materials of the WTO Conference “New Agendas in the 21^st Century”. – Taipei. – 2003.

395.   Wang L. Are Trade Disputes Fairly Settled? // Journal of World Trade. – 1997. – Vol.31 – P. 59-72.

396.   Weiler J.H.H. The Rule of Lawyers and Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement // Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper. – № 09/00. – MA. Cambridge: Harvard Law School, 2000.

397.   Wolf M. What the World Needs from the Multilateral Trading System // The Role of the World Trade Organization in Global Governance by Sampson, G. (ed.). – Tokyo: United Nations Press, 2001. – P. 183-208.

398.   Wolff A.Wm. Major Problems with WTO Dispute Settlement. // Published Remarks at the Global Business Dialogue Inc. – Washington DC, September 2002.

399.   Wolff A.Wm. Reflections on WTO Dispute Settlement // Published Remarks for American BAR Association. – Warrenton: March 1998.

400.   Wolff A.Wm. WTO Dispute Settlement and Trade Remedies // Presentation Before Committee to Support US Trade Laws, at Capitol Hill Symposium. – Washington DC, June 2002.

401. World Trade Organisation. 10 Benefits of the WTO Trading System. – Geneva: WTO, 2003.

402. World Trade Organisation and Commonwealth Parliamentary Association: Regional Workshops for Parliamentarians on the Multilateral Trading System. – Cape Town, Port-of-Spain: WTO - CPA, 2003.

403. World Trade Organisation …In Brief. – Geneva: WTO, 2003.

404.  World Trade Organisation. Issues in Dispute Settlement. – Washington DC: US General Accounting Office, 2000.

405.  WTO and the WTO Dispute Settlement Process. – Bruxelles: Freshfields Bruckhause Deringer, 2003.

406.  WTO Dispute Settlement System: Reforming the Enforcement Mechanism // A RSPB Discussion Paper. – Bedfordshire: RSPB, 2001.

407.  WTO Members Warn Appellate Body on Amicus Procedures // Inside U.S. Trade. – 2000. – №1 (December).

408.  WTO Policy Issue for Parliamentarians. – Geneva: WTO, 2001.

409.  WTO: The Challenges of a New Round of International Trade Negotiations. – Bruxelles: Publication Oxfam Solidarity in Belgium, 1999.

410.   Zieldaski B. The World Trade Organisation and the Transatlantic Banana Split // New England International and Comparative Law Annual. – 1999. – http://www.nesl.edu/annual/vol5/zield.htm

411.   Zimmerman T., Hauser H. WTO Dispute Settlement at Ten: Evolution, Experience, and Evaluation // Aussenwirtschaft – The Swiss Review of International Economic Relations. – 2005. – Vol. 60, № 1. – P. 27-61.

412.   Zleptnig S. The Standard Review in WTO Law: An Analysis of Law, Legitimacy and the Distribution of Legal and Political Authority // European Integration online Papers. – 2002. –Vol. 6(17). – http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2002-017a.htm

Для заказа доставки работы воспользуйтесь поиском на сайте http://www.mydisser.com/search.html

 

[1] См. напр. перечни диссертаций, защищенных в Украине с 1995 по 2006 гг., опубликованные в журнале „Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка”, № 1 за 2005 г., №1 и №4 за 2006 г.

[2] Cм. www.rada.gov.ua